The Triple-Digit IQ Club is for people tired of bad arguments delivered with maximum confidence.

I am Steven. Steven of the Club. Steven of this club. And I make decent arguments, delivered with the minimum amount of uncertainty I can justify.

This is a new project. I’m laying foundation. Everyone is welcome to come and applaud my brilliance or poke me when I’m wrong

I write forensic, funny, occasionally hostile essays about sloppy reasoning, abused language, fake profundity, political nonsense, category errors, and the tiny conceptual trapdoors people keep falling through.

If this project gets off the ground, it’s going to be a lot of fun for me, and my subscribers

If you like watching bad ideas get opened up on the table and examined with a flashlight, this is probably for you.

I am going to poke Substack with a stick and see what it lets me do. I will wring every bit of functionality out of this platform for you.

I’m not here to ‘find my voice’; I’ve been a writer for a long time. I’m here because I miss the age of reason. I’ve decided to fight back against this post-truth Hades-scape, where speaking to people online feels like interacting with a pre-programmed video game character—spitting pre-digested talking points and intellectually scampering at the slightest confrontation instead of standing by their word.

I’m building a logic toolkit. What could you use?

the Argument Field Manual

Alongside the main articles, Field Notes, and the other assorted content I publish here, one of the major projects of the Triple-Digit IQ Club is the Argument Field Manual.

TDiqC = the club/publication/world.
tAFM = the big reference-work project being constructed inside it.

I am building tAFM to be a structured, navigable catalogue of the recurring moves people make when arguments go wrong: distortions, evasions, attacks, retreats, rhetorical tricks, conceptual errors, and the other familiar machinery of bad reasoning. The larger categories map families of related moves; the individual entries take one of them apart in detail—what it is, how it works, what it looks like in the wild, and what to do when somebody uses it.

The aim is to make bad argumentation easier to see. Once a move has a name, a shape, and a place in the larger map, it becomes much harder for it to slip past unnoticed. Over time, I’m trying to turn tAFM into something between a reference work, a forensic toolkit, and a field guide for people who would rather understand an argument than merely survive one.

(Clicking the orange ‘Subscribe Now’ buttons and subscribing is the fastest way to get rid of them)
the Argument Field Manual

the Argument Field Manual

the Argument Field Manual

the Argument Field Manual is a field guide to recurring moves, distortions, slogans, bad frames, and reasoning machinery in public argument.

I’m emptying out the sack of bad ideas I found on the table. Join the cleanup crew.

What Subscribing Gets You

When you subscribe to TDiqC, you’ll initially be subscribed to all three publishing streams: main essays, Field Notes, and the Argument Field Manual. They’re separate Substack sections, though, so you can manage them individually at any time and turn off whichever ones you don’t want. If you’re only here for tAFM, only want the shorter Field Notes, or just prefer the major articles, you don’t have to take the rest.

TDiqC is still taking shape, so this structure may evolve — but you’ll always be able to manage which sections you receive.

Get more from Steven of the Club in the Substack app
Available for iOS and Android

Meet Steven of the Club

If you’re curious about my flavour of argumentation, my intellectual inspirations, heroes, guides and mentors include: George Carlin, George Orwell, Carl Sagan, Christopher Hitchens, Friedrich Nietzsche, Weird Al Yankovic, Captain Paul Watson, Richard Dawkins, Ken Wilber, Siddhartha Gautama, Charlie Chaplin, Amy Goodman, Maynard James Keenan, Martin Luther King Jr, Martin Luther, Terry Pratchett, S. N. Goenka, Farley Mowat, Daron Malakian & Serj Tankian, Noam Chomsky, Peewee Herman, Alan Watts, Richard Feynman, Alison Armstrong, my mom, Bill Hicks, Diogenes, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Robert Anton Wilson, Marcus Aurelius, Stewart Lee, Bjork, Matt Dillahunty, Anohni Hegarty, Scroobius Pip, Maria Bamford, Carl Jung, and Jello Biafra.⠀

Share The Triple-Digit IQ Club

⠀⠀

Why subscribe?

Join the sane majority. It’s going to be crazy!

⠀⠀

⠀⠀

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⊂_ヽ
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀  ⠀⠀\\
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀   \( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀    > ⌒ヽ
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀   /   へ\
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀   /  / \\
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀   レ ノ   ヽ_つ
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀  / /
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀  / /|
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ( (ヽ
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ | |、\
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ | 丿 \ ⌒)
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ | |  ) /
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ノ )  Lノ
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀(_/

⠀🍰 🎀 𝐿𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓂❀𝓉𝓉🏵: 𝒮𝒾𝓁𝓁𝒾𝓃𝑒𝓈𝓈 𝒽𝑒𝓁𝓅𝓈 𝓉𝒽𝑒 𝓈𝒸𝒾𝑒𝓃𝒸𝑒 𝑔🌸 𝒹☯𝓌𝓃 🎀 🍰⠀

⠀⠀

Subscribe if you want to read essays, notes, and logic autopsies from someone using all 100 points of IQ he’s been allotted.

User's avatar

Subscribe to The Triple-Digit IQ Club

This publication teaches argument fu: tools for spotting bad reasoning, naming hidden moves, and arguing better with others — but mostly with yourself. Swatting fallacies like flies is fine, but The First Principle is that You Must Not Fool Yourself.

People